100 Days Social Media Experiment: The Results

All this week I’ll be releasing a five-part series about the results of my social media experiment. 100 Days: Turning Off the Lights on Social Media kicked off the series in early April and I’ve been blogging about my observations here and there. Now that I’m drawing this experience to a close, I’m happy to share my conclusions and results.


When I first started this experiment, I had no idea how much social media played a role in my life as an author and a friend. I was frustrated and overwhelmed, because I felt obligated to use the tools and be connected at all times. I didn’t realize how much of a perceived burden this connectivity was until I wrote this article entitled Hunting Down the Value of Social Media on SFWA.org and had a frank chat with my friend Matt Forbeck.

After being in e-commerce and online marketing for so many years, Matt had pointed out I was hyper-sensitive to certain sticking points. So, on a surface level, I was getting really annoyed with day in and day out personas of people I knew that were trying to present themselves in a different light to get visitors or clicks. Remember, I travel in many creative circles, so it’s not just “one or two” friends and acquaintances that place a lot of value on their web presence. It’s — quite literally — hundreds.

While I have “unlearned” something often preached about in online marketing — the idea that there are best practices and one must not (typically) deviate from them — at the time I was more opinionated than I wanted to be and, without realizing it, I was really angry with myself about that because I’ve always prided myself on being fair. If anything, this experiment has allowed me to return to my core philosophy: do what works for you.

I’ve made my peace with rampant self-promoters and exaggerated personas, in part because I didn’t see the micro-trends and the near constant “fails” for a few months. The sheer lack of critical comments, opinion and feedback from hundreds of people allowed me to simply…be. The voices in my head returned, my writing is back to the level where it needs to be, and I’m taking calculated risks with my work.

Once I realized that my frustration with social media was the real reason why I felt compelled to stop using it, I dug a little deeper. I wanted to know whether or not it had any real, tangible value to my website or my work.

    Three Questions I Wanted to Know the Answer To

    1. Did getting off of social media hurt my book sales or my chances for publication?

    No.


    2. Did getting off social media hurt my website traffic?

    No.


    3. Did getting off social media kill my social media presence?

    No.

This week I’ll explore these answers and questions more in depth. I’ll also be talking about ways I’m going to manage my social media presence since I’ll be back online more regularly on Wednesday to prevent that feeling of obligation from ever happening again.

If you have any questions or comments about this experiment, feel free to post them and I’ll try to address them this week.

Thanks for being such a valued part of my readership!

100 Days Experiment of Social Media Silence is Almost Over!

So it’s almost been a hundred days since I’ve been off of Facebook, IMs and Twitter for personal use, and…

…it’s about time.

It has been an absolute chore trying to connect with friends, readers and fellow gamers outside of these tools. Some people are only accessible via Facebook. Others rely on one tool or the other.

Not to mention, both Facebook and Twitter upgraded their messaging system. Now I get e-mails every time someone mentions me on Twitter, re-tweets a link, likes me on Facebook, etc. I even got a message that sounded a little creepy from Facebook, like Hal from Space Odyssey: “Monica, your friends are waiting.”

Last week I logged in to do some maintenance, and over the weekend I broke my silence with a single word: beer.

While I probably won’t be using the tools as much as I have in the past, a hundred days was a long time to conduct this experiment. I’ve learned a lot since I’ve been offline but, in the end, my conclusion is the same as my assumption: it’s just a tool like any other.

The interesting thing, is that getting off of social media has allowed me to do away with some really bad habits of mine. Like whenever I saw a “fail” meme, I felt obligated to uncover the real story instead of just blowing it off. Or when I noticed a blatant falsehood or incorrect piece of data, and felt it was necessary to help the person out — whether they wanted it or not. (You know, because no one is wrong on the internet… ever…)

The funny thing is, I’m finding that the less I know the better I feel and the more focused I am. I turned off Google Alerts and I’ll be turning off notifications, too. While I don’t (won’t) do away with social media completely, I feel I’ve finally got a grip on what I want to use the tools for.

And the best part? I no longer feel obligated to use them.

Less than a week and a half to go! Oy! In the meantime, I’m going to take a break from blogging this week so I can focus on my vampires.

‘Till then!

Girl Geek Week: On Exploitation and Role Models

Girl Geek WeekTo end the week, I went back and forth about what the best type of post would be. I’ve addressed some serious topics and added in some fun things, but I don’t really feel I’ve gotten to the “core” of why a girly and geeky celebration is so important.

I talked a little bit about the concept of tribalism in my post entitled “tribes and our role as a writer,” but the truth is that groups and cliques exist pretty much everywhere, in every corner of society. The same, though, can be said with the way that women treat each other.

Is it Exploitation if There’s No Personal Gain?

Take the Playing D&D with pr0n stars blog for example. This is a blog about Dungeons and Dragons which just happens to be written by a GM who works with women in the pr0n industry. Many people have blasted the blog saying it’s the exploitation of women.

Me? Yeah, I don’t think the people saying that understand what exploitation is. Couple things here. First? The majority of the posts are about gaming. Second? There’s no pr0n on this site. None. Zero. Zip. Nada. The closest thing this blog gets to addressing any pr0n-related issues (Yes, I’m using the alternate spelling to avoid the spammers…) is this post. Sure the top picture is suggestive, but really? Is it that bad compared to some of the RPG artwork we’ve seen?

In order for an incident of exploitation to occur, there needs to be an unethical use of something or someone for personal gain. Read the site and you’ll probably come to the same conclusion I did. This is not written or developed in a way that exploits these women. I feel what people do take issue with, is the fact that this guy is gaming with several women in the adult entertainment industry. The circumstance, more than the blog, is what people are decrying.

Sadly, Appearances Still Matter

I wanted to bring up this example as a way to highlight a deeper issue — the way other people comment on a woman’s looks whenever she proclaims: “I’m a geek.” You could say that society as a whole is obsessed with looks, but what all of these comments boil down to is this: our society assumes geeks are outcasts, and outcasts are often labeled that way because of their physical appearance and possessions.

If the woman (or man) is “hot,” geeks will accuse that person of lying. There’s no way a good-looking individual could possibly know what it’s like to be a geek. If the woman (or man) is average-looking, then you’ll get: “Well, that’s the best [insert industry of your choice] is going to get.” [Actual statement, by the way.]

Are people couching those criticisms in those terms? Most of the time they’re not. Within the geek culture, we have are own set of rules, rituals and assumptions about who belongs and who doesn’t. It sucks to say that, but it’s true. Sub-groups exist and they often coalesce around a particular experience, device, company or property. Live Action Role Players versus tabletop. D&D 4E vs. D&D previous editions. Collectors vs. casual fans. Literary vs. popular fiction. XBox 360 vs. PS3 and so on.

The ironic part about these sub-groups, is that geeks understand what it means to be excluded from [topic/item of your choice]. Yet, the tribes still exist. Add women on top of that? And now you get sub-sub-groups. You get “the group of one.” The girl who’s only into comics because her boyfriend is. The girl who spent hours on her LARP costume to get attention. The girl who can’t possibly excel at video games because she’s just playing for the pretty pictures.

There’s No Ostrich in Ostracize

Add another woman in the same group and now you get…wait for it… competition. Or so others might have you believe. On a broader scale, what happens is that there’s a period of adjustment every group goes through whenever someone new — male or female — is added. On the micro scale? We still have assumptions about what women should and shouldn’t get into.

Yes, these are sweeping generalizations and for some people I can understand why they come across as inflammatory. Yes, you can probably come up with hundreds of examples of where this is not always the case, too.

However, the point I’m trying to make, is that no matter how isolated or how ostracized we may feel for being a geek, some of us are guilty of doing the same things other people have done to us. We defend anyone who’s picked on, sometimes without knowing all the details of the situation (e.g. person really was acting like a troll), because we understand what it’s like to be bullied. So why then, can’t we be more accepting of other geeks? Women, especially?

We’re so caught up on our personal need to be validated and accepted, sometimes we forget that in order to do that? We should start by respecting other geeks.

Does that mean I’d have an “open arms” approach and accept all geeks (regardless of gender)? Yeah, not a chance. I’m not going to be nice to an *sshole just because he (or she) is a geek. You can rationalize it all you want, but sometimes? An *sshole is still an *sshole. Like jocks and goths, calling someone a “geek” is a way for people to identify that person in a particular group. Beyond that? Saying he or she is a geek tells me nothing about the quality of the person. All that does, is tell me we might have similar interests.

The Need for Female Role Models

I believe the solution to get past our stereotypes is to go the route of anti-exploitation and seek out female role models within each industry that we love. Maybe she’s an amazing costume designer. Maybe she’s got a mean trigger finger on her controller. Maybe she knows everything there is to know about Wonder Woman.

As a whole, we need more role models who are comfortable with their interests, are not afraid to talk about them and are open to talking with other geeks who don’t share similar passions. We need leaders who can identify with fans and creators, who can transcend the tribal boundaries we’ve created.

We need role models who aren’t afraid to tell the truth: there’s a little bit of geek in everyone.

I hope you’ve enjoyed this series of posts celebrating girl geeks and, at the very least, maybe these discussions will activate your neurons and charge your batteries.

Girl Geek Week: Yes, Handmade Jewelry is Cool

So, a couple of the prizes in the freaking fabulous contest were a few jewelry designs made by yours truly. I worked at a bead supply store back in college and started getting into it because I have some metal allergies. Well, that…and I can make a lot of the pieces you’ll see in the store for literally pennies on the dollar for myself.

Planets on the LoomOver the years, I’ve given gifts and have infected other people with the jewelry design bug. Some of the techniques are pretty easy; others are definitely more complicated. Fortunately, I found a haven at a local bead store called Fat Cat Beads. Classes are really inexpensive and I’ve been going through my bead inventory and designing more of my own. My style is a little bit more mod than supreme frou-frou, but I’ve got a few more complex designs that I’ll get into below.

This first picture is the beginning of an part-original/part-patterned design I’m working on that will eventually turn into a cuff bracelet. Right now, my biggest frustration is the size of the seed beads. Loom weaving requires a lot of concentration and if you get beads that aren’t the same size as the others, you can easily lose count and have kind of a warped effect to the design. Owl Earrings As you can imagine, this is also ridiculously time-consuming and I’m nowhere near done. After the beads have been attached to the loom, then there’s the issue of sewing it onto a leather fabric and embellishing on top of that.

Quite a few of the pieces I enjoy wearing have a natural element to them. I fell in love with these little owls and added some fluorite round beads to them. I love natural stones because no two are alike and they often add an unusual or nonrepetitive element to the design. I have some glass leaf beads and ladybugs that I’m playing around with specifically for that reason.peyote stitch bracelets

These two bracelets are hand-stitched using the “peyote” technique. That particular style of bead stitch is extremely old and has been used by Native Americans. The beads don’t stack in a straight line; they are a little zig-zagged. The one on the bottom is black with a transparent maroon which I made to match my corset. Tree of Life pendant with Tiger's EyeThe one on the top was my first attempt at playing around with a design. I really like how it turned out because it’s very three-dimensional. Next I want to play around with square beads of different sizes, including a pile of six-sided dice I have.

Last, but certainly not least, I’ve been playing around with the Tree of Life pendant design. While you can use beads for the leaves, I prefer to use gemstone chips because it looks more realistic. This is a fall version of the pendant and I have a spooky one for Halloween I just have to put together. The really cool thing about this design that I learned from Robin, is that you can make several of them and no two will ever look exactly alike.

While these pieces are a little bit more traditional in the sense that they’re not super-girly-geeky, there’s a reason for that. I’ve been focusing on technique and materials at the moment, because I’ve got a few ideas rumbling around in my head that’ll either tie directly into the stories I write or be something perfect for girl geeks.

More to come on that!

Girl Geek Week: Top 20 Signs You Might Be a Prima Geek-a

Girl Geek Week ContestHave you ever wondered whether or not you’re a geek? Well, question thyself no further! Today’s post will talk about the top twenty signs you might just be a prima geeka. (Or primo geeko for ye of thee male persuasion.)

Don’t forget! To enter the Freaking Fabulous Contest all you have to do is write about your geek passion! So if there’s something on this list that you’re saying: “Oh, yeah… That’s me…” Well, share your geek love with the world.

Top 20 Signs You’re a Geek

    20. You know how to pronounce Nyarlathotep properly. (And will enthusiastically correct anyone who doesn’t.)

    19. Not only are your dice color-coordinated, you have a set of special dice you break out “just” on important occasions.

    18. You know how to put together a steampunk costume that doesn’t involve a corset and a dragon over-the-shoulder.

    17. You can’t discuss the new Doctor Who without mentioning which of the old Doctor Whos was your favorite.

    16. There’s only one definition of role-playing game and it involves a pencil and a character sheet.

    15. You can’t stand Avatar (or movie of your choice) because the writers got the science wrong.

    14. You’re extremely vocal about how you hate seeing vampires fall in love with humans because you secretly wish you were one.

    13. You think Lovecraft should be taken seriously and go into fits whenever you see a cute likeness of Cthulhu. (But don’t mind owning My Little Cthulhu.)

    12. You have more bookshelves than wall space.

    11. Your answer to “Who is the first Green Lantern?” is not Hal Jordan.

    10. You own a copy of the Street Fighter RPG by White Wolf.

    9. You wrote a very angry e-mail to Michael Bay after watching the new Transformers.

    8. You haven’t seen the Star Trek re-boot because to you? It doesn’t exist.

    7. You’re pissed off about Wonder Woman’s costume change because you still have a crush on Linda Carter.

    6. You can name the differences between a red dragon and a black dragon, what the range of their “weapon” is and how much damage it does.

    5. You can point out how Blade the movie (not the comic) ripped off Vampire: the Masquerade.

    4. You own a limited edition [of your choice] for its monetary value.

    3. You only watch anime in its original Japanese with English subtitles because it’s not as good otherwise.

    2. You’ve written (or read) Final Fantasy fan fic.

    1. You know who’d win the “astronauts versus cave men” fight.

Previous Posts Next Posts




Looking for Monica’s books and games that are still in print? Visit Monica Valentinelli on Amazon’s Author Central or a bookstore near you.

Archives

Back to Top