Halloween Pumpkins and (Of Course) Cats!

Here’s some pictures of our Halloween festivities. Our cats are both rescues; Rimmon is a black kitty and Zakar (We call him Zak Zak for short or whiner-butt) is a polydactal manx. No tail and ginormous paws. Statistically, black cats are the most commonly ignored, abandoned, and abused. The current superstition that black cats are evil is a mixture of Hollywood symbolism, American advertising, misplaced superstition and biology. Some cats developed their “cry” to mimic the sound of a human child, which is part of where they got their reputation for being a witch’s familiar back in the day. (Just recently in the UK, they launched a Black Cat Awareness Day to highlight the issue that so many need a home.)

Anyway, sorry I got off on a tangent there. Think it’s crazy that people don’t like an animal (and sometimes people) purely based on its coloring. Our cats definitely have their own personalities! By the way, can you tell the vampire bat was mine?





        Happy Halloween Eve!

        Ramblings about Personal Bias Online

        One of the comments someone made about what they want to read here, was about what makes me “me.” During Speak Out with Your Geek Out, I talked about how I’m a hobby anthropologist. *flexes fingers*

        Yep, breaking that hat out today. One of the biggest challenges with online communication is the sheer volume of information we’re inundated with. And there’s a lot of it. The second biggest challenge? Your personal bias. A while back, I used to do a lot of keyword research on the day job, and I found that singular versions of search terms were almost always more popular than the plural. I think this is because the computer is such a singular experience physically. You sit down to your computer. You type on your keyboard. You chat or Tweet or message or e-mail on your account. The actions you take are yours. The words you type are yours. You, you, you.

        (Or rather… Me, me, me.)

        There’s a lot of “me’s” in online communication, which is why it’s so easy to forget that personal bias is common, rampant, and to be expected. What gets me, is the expectation part of personal bias and the hypersensitivity that results from that. Getting back to the whole “the internet is a singular experience” mindset, think about how this translates to what actions people take. Why does someone get pissed off when another person stops following them on Twitter? Why are there crappy comments on YouTube! videos, news sites, etc.? Why are people so gullible with respect to internet rumors?

        It all comes back to bias and what that person is reacting to. I’ve seen incredibly nice people spit vitriol online. I used to wonder why that was, until I realized that they may be incredibly nice “in person” but remove the face-to-face contact and something changes. What you’re left with? Is that person’s mind or psyche. If you’re in a crappy mood and nothing is going right, then that colors how you view the world. Same goes for online, too. Only, it may not be clear who we’re talking to. How old are they? What cultural background do they have? Are they in the city or the country?

        Similar to creating unique characters, when you start attaching other factors to a voice online, that voice is removed from the choir and becomes a soloist. When the only thing you have to go on is their words (and vice versa) they’re still part of the choir because they’re tapping into what you like, what you don’t, what you believe, and what you’re skeptical about. In other words, your ability to empathize is diminished because you’re hearing the words in the way you want to hear them. What you’re missing, is the “who” that’s speaking those words.

        My solution to eliminating personal bias online is to take a page from the instructions I got as a kid. Mind you, these directions were to avoid getting hit by a car, but I think the same applies here.

        Stop. Look. And listen.

        I feel that the way we communicate online will continue to suffer the more rapidly our access to communication increases. Can’t tell you how many e-mail signatures I’ve seen lately that say something to the effect of: “I’m on my Blackberry. Responses are short. Please don’t take it personally.”

        To explain every nuance in communication is nothing short of exhausting. To react emotionally to every nuance in communication is, in my mind, a consequence of hypersensitivity. Today, I had someone take a joke seriously. So I said: maybe I should start color-coding my words? When those misinterpretations happen, I feel that we begin to stray toward obsessive thinking about our words. Recently, John covered that concept in Dork Tower and based on the responses, I know I’m not alone in this.

        Quite frankly, I obsess enough over my stories. I don’t want to fixate on every turn of phrase I post online, because that’s an exercise in insanity. It happens, though. Especially when someone doesn’t stop, look or listen to the “me” behind the words.

        There are topics I avoid because I know what my buttons are. I do get a little frustrated when people feel compelled to edit my social media updates. It blows my mind when you see people criticize or edit other people’s Tweets by saying: “You should have…” Or “Company A has to…” or flat out corrects typos, etc.

        What they’re really saying? “I prefer that you…” Or “I feel that Company A should…”

        Again, it circles back to that personal bias. One of the lessons I learned from my hundred day experiment, is that the more connected I am, the worse my personal bias gets unless I catch myself. I feel this is universal. Maybe we could all use an internet detox every now and then?

        I don’t understand why, when people are unhappy with a company, they post about it online assuming that company will pay attention. Customer service departments do exist. Unfortunately, many companies have struggled with how to best communicate online. Instead of coming up with a plan before they dive in, they react to situations. While that may work for some, the end result is bad PR. I know a few companies think that bad PR is better than no PR at all because you’re no longer invisible.

        Recently, I sent a letter to Lego asking them about their board games and why the mini-figs were so small. I explained that I preferred a larger size because I wanted to use the figs in my fantasy game as miniatures. And they responded back explaining that the size of the figs was intentionally designed to match the size of the game. They also said that they do review suggestions internally. Makes sense to me. Their site was easy-to-use and the feedback loop was great!

        So in addition to Stop. Look. And listen. I’d also offer: Ask. Language is ever-changing and it’s proving to be the Tower of Babel. A lot of us are saying something and we all want to be heard. But even with all these words, how many of us really understand what is being said?

        Anyway, thanks for listening. Not sure if I’ve got any answers, but the hobby anthropologist in me had a blast.

        Awesome Halloween Light Show

        This light show to the tune of “This Is Halloween” is made out of win. And, um… To preserve your sanity, just mute the comments.

        I’ll Absorb Stories Wherever I Can

        I’ve been gearing up for several new things the past couple of weeks. New website, new job, new stories, new convention, new case of con crud after said convention… My ability to read or play games often becomes greatly impacted by life in general — even though I don’t want it to be.

        When this happens — and I feel like I’m turning into a cultist faster than you can say “Ia! Ia!” — I become the female version of Indiana Jones. (Mind you, this is not all that unpleasant.) I hunt stories wherever I can find them.

        The Halloween Tree by Ray BradburyWhen I’m swamped? I turn to audiobooks and radio plays to put on in the background. Sometimes, I’ll listen to them a couple of times because I won’t pick up everything the first time around. But, unlike reading books, I can listen to audiobooks multiple times and not get bored. It’s very rare for me to read the same book twice.

        I just listened to The Halloween Tree by Ray Bradbury. This is a brilliant, two hour radioplay that dives into the history of Halloween. I love the social commentary and the technique Bradbury uses to explore the historical aspects without bogging down the story. Even though there’s a cast of kids plus an iconic adult, I didn’t feel that this was written for kids in that sense. I’ve also got a radioplay version of The Martian Chronicles.

        5 Very Good Reasons To Punch a Dolphin In The MouthWhen I’m not listening to audiobooks (Hint: I could always use an iTunes gift card…) then I’ll turn to webcomics for a short, digestible story I can consume in five seconds or less. I recently turned to Twitter to ask for people’s recommendations; my repertoire consists of Dork Tower, Two Lumps, The Oatmeal, Order of the Stick, Irregular Webcomic, Questionable Content, PvP Player versus Player, Ctrl Alt Delete, and a few others. I just picked up 5 Very Good Reasons To Punch a Dolphin In The Mouth (And Other Useful Guides) at New York Comic Con. It’s signed! Yay! I’ve also been pouring through all the Dork Tower trades and getting new comics up for John at DriveThruComics.com.

        Both of these mediums allow me to dive into stories even though I may not have the time to block out an hour or two for reading. Since I’m always writing or working on some project (even if it’s in my head), I like to surround myself in stories to keep myself grounded.

        Have any audioplays, podcasts or webcomics to recommend? Share ’em!

        Comics, Female Writers, and Change

        I read comics. Part of the reason why I do, is because I like reading them. The other reason why I do, is because I feel it’s my job as a writer to explore as many written mediums as possible. The juxtaposition of text and artwork, combined with using “only” the necessary words to tell a story, is a skill unto itself. Comic script writing, like any other form, is in its own category and is not mastered by everyone. For the most part, my storytelling (and reading) tastes run dark, but not gory, or humorous. Give me a hero (iconic or not) who changes as a result of what happens and you’ll have a fan for life. Hmm… Maybe that’s why I prefer Batman to Superman. *evil grin* Although… Hrmmm…

        I wrote about the trouble with female superheroes a while back, and then recommended a character who’d be great for a stand-alone superheroine movie or two. And then I came across this article about female comic characters in pants and read quite a bit about the re-launch of DC’s line. Here’s an article about Catwoman’s boobs and another where DC pledges to hire more women writers.

        You get the picture.

        The thing is, I don’t feel any comic book company sets out to be malicious or put out a crappy product for its readers. I do, however, feel that comic books have a high cost of production and that affects the end result. On one comic, a penciller, inker, colorist, letterer, writer, and editor could be listed in the credits. Unless (and this has happened) an artist has taken on multiple roles by themselves. When DC announced that they’d be re-launching all fifty-two lines at the same time? I thought it was aggressive on their part from a creative aspect. That’s not just fifty-two comics, that’s fifty-two separate teams of people. While some of those teammates may overlap, from DC’s perspective they’re looking at deadlines and going toward people with experience.

        Hence, the current predicament in comics lacking female writers, if a company hires based on experience. From the people I’ve talked to? That’s usually the case.

        What I’ve found, is that because comics are so heavily focused on artists, writers like myself who have an idea for a comic need to find an artist to do a spec issue. To do that, I’d have to go to an artist and say: “Hey, I’ve got this great story. Would you do X amount of panels for free? No guarantee the publisher will pick up the idea, unfortunately.”

        So, step one? I’d have to ask an artist to work for free. I’m to the point in my career where I won’t do that. I’m sorry, but in my experiences if you want something done right? You should pay for it. And again, there’s also the pencilling/inking/coloring/lettering that needs to be done. So it’s not just one job, it’s five. Let’s see… Well, step two requires me to make sure I know how to write a comic book script. There’s books on the subject, so I’d have to teach myself on that, unless I take a class or something.

        Next, I’d have to get the spec comic printed. Again, it would be an investment specifically designed to get “that” comic published. I’m not talking about a portfolio of work that isn’t relevant to what I’m selling. I’m specifically talking about a single issue that’s catered to what that company publishes.

        To get an existing comic title, I’d need to be a) a huge fan of that particular comic and b) know someone at the company. It is very rare for a writer to get hired off of a website. Most comic book publishers have submission guidelines. Since we’re talking about DC, here’s a link to theirs: DC Comics Submission Guidelines. It says, and I quote: “At this time, DC Comics does not accept unsolicited artwork or writing submissions.” They do have a Talent Search program, but that is specifically for artists. Not writers.

        Writers, unfortunately, are a dime a dozen in the comics industry. When you start talking media/tie-in properties like Superman, etc. in this economy? You’re also talking about why publishers are leaning toward established writers, or ones that have a celebrity/brand attached to their name. They do this because from a business perspective, Steven King writing a comic will sell more copies than Monica Valentinelli writing a comic, because Steven King has sold millions of books.

        Getting back to the whole writing thing. So, as I (hopefully) expressed there’s all these business concerns on the back end before a comic book publisher gets to the story part. As a reader, that’s where I see the disconnect coming into play. New forms of media, like animated television series and films, have encouraged a broader spectrum of fans. I’m not a hundred percent sure the publishers know what to do with that information.

        My path to reading comics was through movies. I had friends (mostly male) that read comics, but it wasn’t until I saw some of the film adaptations and webcomics that I got excited about reading print comics/trades. The DC animated full-length features are fantastic! What puzzled me, though, is that Green Lantern’s animated origin story is wholly different from the film. When I was watching the live action version, I noticed the lack of/subdued presence of the female characters and female Green Lanterns. If anything, I think the live action films should take a page from way animated films are told.

        Part of what turned me off from comics in my past was the way I was treated when I walked into a comic book store. (Same goes for video game stores, sadly.) Until I got to know the people working there, I was the chick buying comics for her boyfriend, not for myself. With the internet? And digital? I don’t have to worry about that. What I do have to worry is whether or not a comic is device agnostic. (Many are not. See my frustration with iPhone comics.)

        Anyway, I recognized some names from other works and started to explore comics further. I strayed toward non-humanoid stories because I was pretty disappointed with how women (boob physics) were handled. And that sticks, to this day. Hellboy is my favorite because the artistic style supports the over-arcing story. I have a female detective story on the backburner that is so unlike anything that’s out there, that will probably remain in obscurity, because it’s so unlike anything that’s out there. A little bit of the ouroborus, to be sure.

        I have no idea what the solution is to infusing more female writers into the industry. (Same goes for people of color or gay/bi characters.) I have a lot of respect for writers like Gail Simone and Barbara Kesel who’ve worked their asses off to get where they are, but I’d like the path to be easier for new writers. If change happens, I feel it has to be a conscious, carefully-planned decision that goes beyond the team working on a single issue. I know smaller press companies like Top Cow Productions have made those choices on signature characters like Witchblade, and have had success with that. I have every confidence that the same can happen at DC and other publishers, too.

        For some good news and other names of women penning comics, check out the Womanthology project on Kickstarter.

        What about you? Do you agree? Disagree? Think I’m off-base here?

        Previous Posts Next Posts




        Looking for Monica’s books and games that are still in print? Visit Monica Valentinelli on Amazon’s Author Central or a bookstore near you.

        Archives

        Back to Top